|
some quotes from: les fourmis (the ants, de mieren) [trilogy] - bernhard werber |
| orientation | our
senses | obstacle | |
ants
and humans,
(from book 1; introduction on page 7 dutch version)
"...
while you read these lines, on earth:
- 40 humans are born and 30 die
- 700 million ants are born, and 500 million die
human:
mammal, lenghts between 1 and 2 m.; weight: between 30 and 100 kgs
carrying time females: 9 months; omnivore; estimated population: more
than 5 billion idividuals
ant:
insect, lenghts between 0.01 and 3 cm.; weight: between 1 and 150 mg.;
laying: as they need, depending on supply of spermatozoa; omnivore; estimated
population probably: more than one trillion individuals
(edmond wells
encyclopedia of relative and absolute science)
..."
(see also pantha rhei: millennium, where this quote is at the start page) |
| orientation | our
senses | obstacle | |
orientation
(from book 2, pages 374/375 dutch version)
'orientation': most heroic acts of human kind were east to west.
always humans have followed the course of the sun and wondered about the place
where the big fireball sunk. odyssee, columbus, attila..., all of them
thought the solution would be found in the west. to travel west is to
travel to the future.
however, even though some where the sun went, others were curious to find
out where it came from. travelling east is going to the source, of the
sun, but also of yourself.
marco polo, napoleon, bilbo the hobbit (one of the heroes from the lord
of the rings by tolkien) are major people of the east. they believed that,
if there was anything to be found, it would be there, far away, where
everything, including the day, dawns.
in this symbolism of the adventurers remain two more directions. they
have the following meaning: venturing north means looking for obstacles
to measure your own power. travelling south means looking for peace and
calm.
(edmund wells
encyclopaedia of relative and absolute knowledge)
..."
|
|
| top | orientation | our
senses | obstacle | |
|
ten
senses
(from book 2; page 337 dutch version)
(discussion on the organs of sense between jonathan and his son nicolas)
"say, nicolas, how many organs of sense do you have?"
"five"
"which?"
"sight, sound, ...uhh, the sense of tactile, taste and smell," said the
boy as if he was being tested.
"and more?" asked jonathan.
"nothing more."
"very well. you just named the five physical senses that enable you to
understand the physical reality. but there is this other reality, a psychic
one, that you may comprehend with five psychic senses. if you limit yourself
to only your five physical senses, it is as if you would only use the
fingers of your left hand. why wouldn't you also use the fingers of your
right hand?"
nicolas was surprised
"what are those other five psy-chic senses, as you call them?"
"emotion, imagination, intuition, universal awareness and inspiration."
"and i just started to believe i only thought with my head, my brains,
and now this..."
"oh no, there are many ways of thinking. our brain is just like a computer.
you can program it to make the most fantastic things of which you have
no idea. it is a tool that we got of which we never found the instructions
for use. at this time we use no more then ten percent. in a thousand years
we may be using fifty percent. and in a million years maybe ninety. in
our heads we are babies. we do not understand half of what is happening
around us."
"you exaggerate. modern science..."
"oh no! science means nothing. it only serves to impress those that do
not know anything about it. real scientists know they know nothing and
the further they go the more they discover that they know really nothing."
"but uncle edmond..., he knew things..."
"no, edmond leads us the way to our own independence. he shows us how
to raise questions, but he does not give answers. when you begin to read
in the encyclopaedia of the relative and absolute knowledge you get the
idea you understand all, but then, when you continue reading, you get
the feeling that you do not understand anything at all anymore." |
|
| top | orientation | our
senses | obstacle | |
|
obstacle
(from book 2; page 145 dutch version)
"'how': the first question a human puts when confronted with an
obstacle is "why is this obstacle here and who caused it?" the human will
find the guilty one(s) and thinks of a punishment so that it will not
happen again
in the same situation the ant will think first: "how to get rid of this
obstacle and with help of whom?" in the world of ants 'guilt' does not
exist
there will always be the difference between those that wonder why things
do not work and those that think 'how can i make them work'
in our time the human world is at the phase of 'why', but the day will
come when those that think 'how' will take power.
(edmond wells,
encyclopaedia of relative and absolute knowledge, part 2)" |
|